A Year in the Life of the Secretary
of an English Lodge
By Bro Alan B Bevins, Past Provincial
Junior Grand Warden (Surrey) EC
Presented to United Masters Lodge No 167 NZ,
at the meeting on 22 Apr 1999
Preamble
This is the story of a year in the life of a typical English lodge
secretary. It reflects the happenings of a typical English lodge,
if there is such a thing, though its procedures are normal English
practice. It reflects the work of a real lodge and the writer hopes
that the members will recognise their part in the story and be comfortable
with it. The writer is now removed geographically from the lodge,
only attends annually, and misses the harmonious friendly and relaxed
nature of the members and the meetings. The writer although involved
in its formation and history and now removed many thousands of miles
was at the time of writing in the office of Chaplain! After relinquishing
the Secretary's chair and upon being appointed to that office he
used to say that the Chaplain's job could be done from anywhere.
He meant within the lodge room and not thousands of miles away,
however, he did offer to do the prayers by fax.
This paper can be looked upon as a thank you for allowing him to
play a major part in the lodge formation. As he said to the lodge
in October 1997, now was the time for younger Past Masters to imprint
their character on the lodge, as it must remain a dynamic evolving
body to keep the membership strong.
The Place
The place was 30 miles or 40 km west of London in the Masonic Province
of Surrey, as far north and west as was possible without crossing
the boundary into the two Provinces of Berkshire or Hampshire &
the Isle of Wight. It was partly rural and partly urban, within
easy commuting distance of London and of coastal cities such as
Southampton. A major motorway ran roughly east-west through the
middle of the area. It was a cluster of towns around Aldershot,
Camberley and Farnborough all of which arose through the development
of the British Army over the last few centuries.
The Lodge
The name was St Crispin Lodge, which had been chosen by the founders
because of the association with Agincourt Lodge the mother lodge
of which several of them were members. The Battle of Agincourt had
been fought by King Henry V on St Crispin's Day, the 25th October
in 1415. The meeting dates of the lodge were the fourth Thursdays
in the month so that the one in October would, from time to time,
fall on St Crispin's Day. The lodge logo designed to be simple and
less costly for jewels, seen on the banner, the Past Master's jewel,
and the agendas, was a stretched animal skin, on which were a King
Henry V crown with the square and compasses. St Crispin and St Crispinian
were two brothers in medieval times, workers in leather, shoemakers,
who did much for charity by making shoes for the needy. The motto
shown on the lodge badge below the animal skin was 'Deo Gracias',
said to have been spoken by Henry V upon receiving news he had won
the battle.
It was a Surrey lodge, about 17 years old, had over 50 members,
about the average size, and met in a Masonic Centre in Hampshire.
It was formed from members of one of the lodges in Camberley and
began its life in the town where at that time there were four lodges
(one of which was a Hampshire lodge), two chapters (one of which
was a Hampshire chapter), a Mark lodge (which later moved to meet
in Hampshire) and a Knights Templar Preceptory. Some members also
belonged to lodges in Hampshire, Berkshire and London. They came
from all imaginable occupations and backgrounds. The jobs and professions
included: engineer, electronics engineer, electrician, policeman,
printer, cafe proprietor, builder, sports therapist, prison hospital
warder (several of these), airline operations manager, airline pilot,
airport building engineer, salesman, dry-cleaning shop owner, airline
ground trainer, school master, building site supervisor, management
consultant, newspaper shop licensee, pub licensee, bookshop owner,
fireman, garage proprietor, banknote salesman, casino cashier and
butcher.
Of the 18 founders, the four who started the process were members
of the mother lodge, three of which were joiners of that lodge and
had been initiated in lodges in London, Wales and the USA. The petition
for the new lodge, when presented to the mother lodge by the Master
designate who was one of those four, was 'authorised' by the other
three of them who were the reigning Master and both Wardens. At
the time of writing, there were nine founders still on the membership
roll of which six were active members.
A year previously the lodge had moved from Camberley and crossed
the County (and Province) boundary to meet in Hampshire at a Masonic
Centre with better dining facilities and a good bar, as the then
meeting place built around the late 1880s, and converted in 1925
for Masonic use, was unlikely to be developed into a proper centre
as the members had hoped. Until that move, the members had to drive
two miles after the lodge meeting to the rugby club pavilion where
the meal was laid on, at a price of £9.00. The dining location
had been changed several times mainly because successive restaurants
had changed ownership and rebuilding or refurbishing took place
when this happened. At one location, the room was L-shaped. The
table was thus in the form of a square which was novel, but the
two Wardens who sat at the end of each table run, as was the normal
custom in English lodges, could not see each other, though they
both could see the Master who sat at the apex. That led to many
amusing incidents and much friendly banter between the extremities
of the two table arms where the occupants knew by the voices who
was where but could not see each other.
The lodge met seven times per year at monthly intervals at a regular
time of 5.30 in the evening, followed by a full four course meal,
which usually began about 8.30. Even though the meal was at restaurants,
in a separate room, the room was always tyled and Masonic speeches
and Masonic fire were used.
The Secretary
The Secretary was for two years before the lodge was formed, the
organising or petitioning secretary, a role which encompassed most
of the preparation work before the consecration. He was also the
first Master, sometimes referred to as the 'Primus' Master. Immediately
after that first year he took up the Secretary's pen. He was considered
to be the 'keeper' of the founders' intentions and when any discussion
arose about this he was the authority they turned to for his memory
of earlier events and agreements, as well as the written word of
meetings which had taken place earlier. He was in his sixties and
had been in the Craft for some 30 years or so at the time of writing.
Summer in England
The scene is now set. It was the quiet season. The last meeting
had been held at the end of May and the next was September. Installation
of the new Master and officers was October. There would normally
not be much work for the Secretary for some weeks, or so it may
have seemed. The Secretary always used this time of the year to
get much preparation done to save time later. At the beginning of
June he set up a meeting with the Master and the Senior Warden,
or whoever was likely to be the next Master. The purpose was to
start the potential Master on the process of determining who his
officers would be. As with other lodges in England, it was the Master's
sole discretion to choose and appoint them apart from the Treasurer,
and the Tyler when that officer was not a member of the lodge. The
Treasurer and the Master were elected by the members in a secret
ballot and the Tyler when not a member of the lodge was elected
by a show of hands. The approach the potential Master would make
was to say "if I am elected would you like to be...?"
Some Secretaries were known to be 'kingmakers' in selecting the
officers each year, but our Secretary always insisted the Master
of his own free will and accord, did two major things, firstly to
appoint the officers and secondly to determine the sequence of the
degree work and his programme for the year, appointing those who
would help him with the ceremonies. Members rarely volunteered to
do the regular work in the lodge so the Master usually had to ask
specific members for each part of the work.
The Secretary would not tell him who to appoint as officers, but
would advise him the consequences, good and bad, of specific appointments
so he (the new Master) could better assess what to do. The current
Master would also inject into the discussion the import of the conversations
he had a year earlier when he was asking members to take up office.
The Secretary would also include the names of those who had earlier
stepped aside and wished to return to the 'ladder' of offices. He
would include comment on specific member's aspirations which had
been communicated to him, but without breaking any confidences entrusted
to him. He acted as a confidante to many members on lodge-related
situations as well as being the fount of constitutional knowledge.
That annual discussion included consideration of Past Masters due
for elevation to Provincial office, since each year Provincial Grand
Secretary asked for nominations. Whereas this was from a limited
number of Past Masters, and often was easy to determine the candidates,
views were usually explored. This was later discussed more fully
in a committee meeting. It was normal for each Past Master in turn
to be promoted to Provincial office after a wait of several years.
Some years there was no appointment.
That meeting was also to brief the new Master on what his role
was and what scope of authority he had. It was a follow up to several
meetings which the Secretary and Senior Warden had during the previous
nine months or so. Another meeting was usually held about two months
later to assess his progress on the officer list. This period could
either be smooth or stormy dependent on the reaction by members
as to the office they were asked to fill, or not fill as the case
may be. There were always many phone calls between the potential
Master and the Secretary for a few weeks. During this time, the
Secretary himself approached members to fill the roles of the two
auditors, the two Master Masons on the lodge committee, the representative
for the Provincial Charity Committee, the three trustees for the
lodge Benevolent Fund and three trustees for the lodge Charities
Association. Some of those elections were in September and others
in October. In some years a member had to be found to volunteer
to be Treasurer.
The long quiet season was the best to do all this activity. As
it was summer, there were also social events such as barbecues and
pub skittles matches, which gave the Secretary a chance to speak
to members face to face rather than over the phone. The skittles
matches were with a Hampshire lodge, and the venue was the Masonic
Centre bar, where a skittles run was assembled as needed. This was
far from perfect and the joins between sections in the run required
appropriate skill to get an accurate shot. The skittles too had
seen better days and often failed to stay upright long enough to
be knocked down. There was no restriction how many players took
part. It didn't matter who was on which side as long as the two
captains were not from the same lodge. Often the result was unimportant
too, particularly when the scorer(s) lost count. A raffle was held
which usually made a tidy sum for charity.
Other things were also necessary to be done during this time. The
Master on leaving office was always presented with a Past Master's
breast jewel, and this had to be ordered at least twelve weeks ahead.
This was in addition to his proper light blue collar with the narrow
silver stripe and jewel which all Past Masters had to wear to be
recognised as such. There was also regalia to get, the Past Master's
collar and collar jewel which the intended wearer paid for, and
the new Master's apron which the lodge paid for. The meeting dates
were re-confirmed with the Masonic Hall secretary. The dining arrangements
for the Masonic year were agreed with the caterer. The Steward who
was at the top of the list of Stewards each year was given the responsibility
for arranging the dining table plan and for accepting apologies
and guests attendance under delegation from the Secretary. A briefing
meeting was arranged with him for this. In many English lodges,
this role was done by the Assistant Secretary, usually a Past Master,
but our lodge always felt that it was an excellent role for a younger
member to be involved with lodge administration and to get to know
all the members better.
The financial year ended on 30th June so the Treasurer usually
needed help to do the books, and chase for late subscriptions. There
were several Treasurers during the lodge's history and almost all
of them left the accounting to the end of the year and then experienced
difficulties in getting the books fully made up. This invariably
meant that the accounts were rarely ready to put to the lodge meeting
in September as required by the bylaws. The founders had determined
June as the end of the financial year so that the Treasurer could
use the quiet summer months to get the accounts ready in time. At
the same time the annual return of membership was due to the Grand
Secretary and the Provincial Grand Secretary.
A visit was made to the lodge room to check the equipment. Items
frequently went missing as the room was used by other lodges. Those
lodge members who put their own equipment away removed anything
which was movable, and if the lodge did leave anything out it would
be spirited away into another lodge's store. It was a time to check
whether the candles needed replacing, the quantity and type of regalia,
aprons etc books of constitutions and rituals needed for the year.
The Master-elect was reminded about the charity collection taken
during each meeting. Unless he announced at each collection as it
is about to be done where the money was to go, then it automatically
went to the lodge Benevolent Fund. Our Secretary always insisted
that members must be given the opportunity to choose whether to
support the specific charity announced or not. The charity usually
chosen was the one which the Provincial Grand Master had said he
would support. Its worth digressing at this point to explain what
the arrangement is in England and Wales for charity activities.
Under the charities legislation lodges themselves are not able
to gain charitable status, but they may set up funds which can be
registered as charities such as benevolent funds for distribution
of money or charities associations for its collection. At Grand
Lodge level, the charitable body is the Grand Charity set up in
1980 to replace the Board of Benevolence. Provincial and District
Grand Lodges have a similar body. Grand Lodge collects in addition
to the annual dues a donation of about £2.00 per member on
behalf of the Grand Charity. Even though that donation is only taken
only from members in England and Wales, Grand Charity do allocate
funds overseas too. The fund is for deserving charities and for
members and their dependents in distress. Lodge Treasurers include
that donation into the costing of the annual subscriptions. At lodge
level, it is a well-established routine for four methods of collection
of money. Firstly, at each meeting an agenda item usually before
the first rising, is entitled the 'charity column', the 'charity
box', the 'broken column' or a similar name, where a box sometimes
of ingenious design is passed round the lodge or taken around by
the Deacons so that members and guests can deposit their donation.
It is normally expected to be the highest coin (£1) or the
lowest bank note (£5) or a few pieces of 'silver'. Secondly,
at the dinner table there is a raffle. Thirdly, members are encouraged
to donate an annual sum preferably by covenant with a tax advantage
if the lodge charities association is registered as a charity. Fourthly,
there are social events at which raffles are arranged. Legislation
in 1992, put greater responsibilities upon lodge charity trustees
so Grand Charity arranged for a system where lodges could have their
funds managed by them under the title Relief Chest, also taking
advantage of greater interest rates for the size of the money handled.
Thus the collection of money for charity is an accepted routine
activity therefore the role of a Charity Steward is that much easier
and there is a constant inflow of funds, without the need to exhort
members frequently.
As we know, in English Masonry, there are the two schools, the
homes, and formerly the hospital now the New Masonic Samaritan Fund,
charities for our own members and their dependents. The latter replaced
the hospital west of London with the capability of medical support
worldwide. These four charities are mainly financed from the Festivals.
Each year, an English Province is nominated as the patron of one
of those charities and hosts the festival on a planned date. For
several years up to that, money is accumulated by the lodges in
the Province for the fund and the total achieved is announced at
the festival. Members who had donated above a fixed but quite small
amount would be designated as Stewards and could with the addition
of a nominal fee acquire a specially designed jewel to be worn for
the year. The jewel carried the badge of the Province and/or the
personal coat of arms of the Provincial Grand Master. London, which
is not a Province, from time to time also hosted one of the festivals.
The Master-elect was also reminded about the routine items included
in each of the three risings. In England, normally, all business
administration was done in those risings. The First related to Grand
Lodge, the second related to Provincial Grand Lodge and the third
to lodge level and all other matters except those of a social and
non-Masonic nature which were taken at the dining table. By September,
the notification had usually been received from Provincial Grand
Secretary as to who was the annual visitor on behalf of the Provincial
Grand Master, and the meeting suggested as the nominated date. The
Secretary also advised the Master Elect on the routine where as
Master he would appoint the workers for each meeting in advance
but that on the night the Director of Ceremonies found substitutes
for absences, which allowed the Master to prepare himself for the
meeting, and to greet guests.
September
The fourth Thursday in September was the first meeting. It was
conducted by the Past Masters which gave the Master the period from
May to October to get ready for installing his successor. The November
and September meetings were always reserved for initiations so that
the candidate had most of the year's meetings ahead of him to get
to know the other members.
The agenda was typed and sent to the printer. The Secretary always
sent the job to the printer at about five weeks before the meeting
with a target date which then allowed time for putting in envelopes,
and posting, so that the members got them at about ten days in advance
of the meeting. That gave the printer about two weeks to do them.
More than one printer had been used over the years and they all
left the job until the last minute and seemed only to do them when
chased. More recently, the agendas were done by a member who used
his home computer which meant it was more timely and accurate.
On the agenda, the Secretary always put two names against a degree
ceremony in case the first choice was unable to attend at the last
minute. Comment was often made by members of English lodges that
if a name or any other item was not on the agenda it could not be
taken. A regular agenda item was 'any other business brought regularly
before the lodge' which covered any such eventuality and silenced
the critics. There was however, one occasion when a candidate did
not turn up and the Secretary had only the one candidate at that
level. In agreement with the Master and having consulted the Director
of Ceremonies he asked another member who was due to progress to
another degree if he was willing to take it. As he was willing,
when opened, the lodge as a whole was asked to decide, which it
did, in the positive.
On another occasion the Secretary was asked to point out politely
to a Grand Officer guest to mind his own business when the candidate
in a First degree had a ring on his finger, and that visitor stopped
the ceremony to ask for it to be removed. The Secretary said that
the presence of a ring which could not be removed, was not a bar
to the ceremony taking place as normal. It was insensitive to stick
overly strictly to the letter of the ritual and thus embarrass the
candidate and that his intervention had done just what was intended
to be avoided.
October
October was the installation meeting. All work was done by Past
Masters who were members of the lodge except that the address to
the Master was sometimes done by a relative or friend of his who
was from another lodge, and the address to the brethren was always
done by a Past Master from the mother lodge, as a continuing link
with that lodge. Masters of the other lodges in the town were invited
to the Installation and their dining fee was paid by the lodge.
Normally two or three attended. The Secretary composed a one-page
addition to the lodge history using the minute book as the source
of information, which was sent out with the Installation agenda.
Each year, the lodge received a formal visit from Province. It
was often to the Installation meeting. Where such visits took place,
if the official visitor was other than the Provincial Grand Master
his Deputy or one of the Assistants, he went into the lodge with
all the members and guests before the Master, and left after the
Master and Wardens when everyone else did. If it was one of those
Executives, he was usually accompanied by a Director of Ceremonies
and a formal escort was arranged. The lodge was opened normally
and that Director of Ceremonies was admitted. He announced that
the Provincial Grand Master or the Executive was 'without' and called
for 8 members to form the escort. The use of the word 'without'
always caused someone in the room to say 'without what'. The escort
was formed down the centre of the room in pairs, comprising of the
Director of Ceremonies, Assistant Director of Ceremonies, the two
Deacons, the Secretary, the Treasurer, and two Past Masters, and
then they left the room. Outside, they were greeted by the visitor
and returned to form the same double line inside the room, down
which the visitor went to the Master, and after being greeted sat
to the Master's right. As a rule those chairs were empty as they
were only used by Grand Officers, of which there were none in the
lodge membership. Apart from this convention and for specific lodge
officers, there were no special places where members and guests
sat.
The escort could easily form down the middle of the room as the
whole of the open area of the floor was the black and white carpet
with nothing placed upon it. There was linoleum under the rows of
chairs around the room. This carpet was of course well worn in two
or three places. The holder of the Director of Ceremonies office
required extra skills to stay upright when rising to his feet from
his chair. There was also a worn area where the members entered
the room and each new Inner Guard had to learn how to avoid the
holes and the gradually separating edge when he made his usual reports.
Those reports were simplified as a lodge variation from the published
ritual book. All reports on the door were a single knock except
where a candidate was to enter for the first time in the ceremony.
This made it easier for the Junior Warden who's procedure required
him to react differently by standing up in response to three knocks
compared to all single knocks where he remained sitting. The only
variation to the clear floor was in the First and Second degree
ceremonies when the candidate was at the north east or south east
respectively. His feet were placed against an ashlar. A frequent
occurrence was for the second Deacon to fail to remove it in time
for the candidate to move off and fall over it.
There was also a tendency common in a lot of lodges to panic when
an official visitor was due. They felt it was necessary to examine
the lodge differences alluded to earlier, and to revert to the printed
ritual for that meeting. The Secretary had many strong discussions
with members to prevent such changes from the lodge's accepted working.
He often quoted the brief given to the founders when they met the
Deputy Provincial Grand Master at the very start of the founding
process, which was the line taken by the Grand Lodge. Every lodge
had the right to choose its working, that neither Grand Lodge nor
Provincial Grand Lodge would interfere as long as the lodge conformed
to the basic Masonic principles, but that having chosen a working
to let the founders personality and experiences be injected and
stick to it. Naturally, among the founders, there was experience
of several different workings, though all very similar.
As several members were used to the Emulation Working, it was that
book of ritual which the lodge had adopted. The Secretary's view
was that even though the founders had adopted, for this lodge, those
variations their mother lodges did, if the Lodge Committee discussed
any further change to those variations or to any part of the procedures
of the ritual, and recommended this to the lodge which then voted
upon it with a positive result, then that change would be adopted,
but that no change would be adopted without that process taking
place.
One such example was the suggestion that the Chaplain should have
joined the outgoing procession at the end of a meeting. The procedure
was for the Director of Ceremonies and Assistant Director of Ceremonies
to set off round the lodge in the first verse of the closing ode.
The Junior Deacon joined them as they passed him, then the Senior
Deacon, and on the second round the Junior Warden and Senior Warden
in turn also joined the procession. It stopped at the Master's chair
with the two Deacons to the South of it and the two wardens to the
North. The Master then joined, the Wardens closed up and Grand Officers,
if any, plus Provincial and District Grand Officers and holders
of London Grand Rank, sitting Masters of other lodges, but no other
officers. In any case the Chaplain was usually a Provincial Grand
Officer. The only variation to this was the inclusion of the Initiate
or representative of the Provincial Grand Master who joined the
procession alongside the Master, where that representative was not
a Provincial Executive. As a new lodge, it did add to the interest
of the occasion in the early years, for example, when a Master was
doing Universal Working, a Deacon was doing Taylor Working and the
rest were doing Emulation.
November
As mentioned earlier, November was the time for new members to
be introduced and there was always a steady demand for entry to
the lodge. Often this gave rise to discussions on whether to do
double ceremonies or not. The compromise was to do double Seconds
but the other two ceremonies were singles.
December
The lodge did not meet in December as the fourth Thursday would
be Christmas from time to time. Likewise there was no meeting in
March because of Easter. So January February, April and May were
very much routine uneventful meetings except for the usual misinterpretations
of ritual to be set right by the Secretary or the Director of Ceremonies
which even after many years of experience still dogged some members.
January
After the two Initiations and the Installation, the rest of the
year's programme was taken up with two Second degrees and two Third
degrees. Each member was about 18 months to two years in getting
from the initial entry to the Third degree. Immediately after each
Third degree ceremony the Secretary sent a request form to Provincial
Grand Secretary so that the Grand Lodge Certificate arrived before
the next meeting, to be presented, usually by the Secretary. As
a rule the number of candidates was such that some Second and Third
degrees were passed out to other lodges in Berkshire and Hampshire
who were short of work. A simple letter from our Secretary and the
Master making the request met the constitutional rules.
Strange happenings
One member had the ability to communicate with a departed lodge
member. One evening before he joined the lodge, when in the home
of his proposer whom he had known for many years, he described the
movements of a ceremony without knowing what he was actually describing.
The proposer contacted the Secretary and all three (or was it four)
met in the lodge room one evening. This brother then with his eyes
closed pointed out that he was being guided by someone who was sitting
in the Senior Warden's chair, and from the front of that chair moved
around the room taking measured steps. It took the Secretary some
minutes to realise that if he had started from the door, he described
almost perfectly the action of a Senior Deacon in the First degree
ceremony. He described the person from whom he was taking instructions
and the description fitted a member who had died of a heart attack
when in the office of Senior Warden. Some months later when the
brother was introduced into the lodge he said that the deceased
Senior Warden was alongside him during his ceremony.
Another strange but down to earth occurrence was when a member
of another lodge in the Province of Berkshire was proposed for joining.
This itself was not unusual as members joined lodges across the
County/Province boundaries to experience the wider comradeship and
the different workings. This brother had thus far only reached the
stage of being an Entered Apprentice. The Secretary of his Berkshire
lodge refused to create the required clearance certificate confirming
he had no money owing to the lodge. That Secretary rang our Secretary
and in no uncertain terms told our Secretary that none of 'his members'
under any circumstances was allowed to join another lodge until
he had taken all three degrees, and in any case, the Secretary of
the lodge which he was asking to join should write and ask for such
a certificate. Our Secretary's response was to say that there was
no regulation which supported that restriction and that members
must be freely allowed to choose the lodges of which they wished
to be members at any stage in their Masonic career. He said that
our lodge accepted any man for membership providing the proper procedure
was followed, that he was vouched for by a proposer and seconder,
duly interviewed and accepted by the lodge committee, had the proper
forms and was accepted by ballot in open lodge. He asked what would
that Secretary do if one of the members moved to another part of
the country, and said that provision of the certificate was a proper
part of the application by the candidate and his proposer. A clearance
certificate arrived a few days later. On the subject, of certificates
for joiners, our Secretary took the view as many others did that
it was the responsibility of the candidate and his proposer to obtain
the proper certificates, from the lodges of which he was a member.
In any case it would be expected that he was already in regular
contact with that or those Secretaries, and a face to face request
was the best method. It also put pressure on the proposer and candidate
to get the certificate before the ballot.
Committee meetings were held four or five times a year at the home
of the Master or the Secretary until the Lodge moved to Hampshire.
The main hall below the Masonic Hall in the Surrey town was let
to a company which held discos on several nights in the week. This
did have some slight problem in that on lodge nights, if the meeting
was late finishing, the members had to pick their way through the
teenagers who had occupied the entrance and the staircase.
The dinner after each meeting, called the Festive Board reserved
one dinner a year to entertain the ladies. This was apart from the
more formal annual Ladies Night held at a local hall in October
just before the Master completed his year. Many lodges held their
annual Ladies Night in a hotel in the seaside town of Bournemouth
with two nights accommodation and meals included.
There was a 'lodge of instruction' once per month and each lodge
meeting was preceded by a rehearsal. Whereas the lodge of instruction
had a reasonable attendance, of say ten to fifteen, the rehearsals
were very poorly attended, usually only by the Master, the Director
of Ceremonies perhaps the Assistant Director of Ceremonies, a Deacon
or two and possibly a Warden. They retired to the local pub afterwards,
and after the move to the Farnborough Masonic Centre, the in-house
bar.
In each meeting except the Installation meeting, the Director of
Ceremonies or the Secretary did a five minute lecture for the education
of the members, and the lodge of instruction was also used to inform
the members about the Craft and to explain why certain things were
done and what the ceremonies meant. Often members sought preferment
in office without realising that promotion was solely by merit and
not of right. This applied to older members equally as well as the
younger ones. The Secretary explained this by pointing out that
the best way for promotion was to demonstrate their ability by taking
part in ceremonies and other lodge affairs so that those in the
'ladder' ahead of them were aware, because it was those who when
they became Master would be choosing their officers and their ceremony
workers, and not the Secretary, Director of Ceremonies or any other
senior member of the lodge.
The dinner after the meeting as mentioned earlier, was known as
the Festive Board and included not only the formal toasts but 'take
wines'. In most English lodges the Immediate Past Master or the
Master or even the Director of Ceremonies (but always the Master
in this lodge) used the gavel to gain attention, then the Immediate
Past Master would stand and say 'The Worshipful Master would like
to take wine with...' The Master and whoever was named stood and
each raised their glass. In this lodge the Master himself at the
gavel stood and said 'I would like to take wine with...' There were
about seven or eight 'take wines' at pauses in between the courses.
They were used to recognise exceptional work in the ceremonies,
to say welcome back to a member who had been a long time absent,
or had been in hospital, and to find out who had the gravy boat
or mustard pot
The formal toasts were those used in all lodges - five in number,
The Queen, the Grand Master, the Grand Officers, the Provincial
Grand Master, the Provincial and District Grand Officers and holders
of London Grand Rank, and finally the guests. The latter toast was
followed with a reply or sometimes two. The Provincial Grand Master
had his own toast albeit he like all Provincial and District Grand
Masters was a present Grand Officer. Once a year a junior member
proposed a toast to the founders. At the Installation meeting, the
Immediate Past Master toasted the Master and the Master replied.
Then the Master toasted the Immediate Past Master and he replied.
The attendance was about two thirds of the membership, with a small
number of guests, but at the Installation there tended to be a larger
number of guests. Apart from a nominated few paid by the lodge,
all guests paid for their meals as of course did the members.
With six out of seven meetings for degree ceremonies, the Master
delegated most of the work, keeping the first part of a First, a
Second and a Third to himself. The Charge after Initiation, Second
Degree Tracing Board, and the Traditional History following the
Third, were always done by Past Masters and the other three ceremonies
were also done by Past Masters. Apart from the fact that only two
or three could do the Second Degree Tracing Board and the Traditional
History this gave the members a variety of people to listen to thus
generating more interest. The working tools were always done by
a junior member except at the Installation meeting.
May
The calendar was now showing May. The year had turned full circle.
Many events had taken place during the year. Many things had happened
in the same way they had in the previous year and others before
that. Some new events had happened, and now the last meeting of
the year had just taken place which has brought us to the point
where this narrative began.
Alan Bevins, April 1999
Post Script
by W. Bro Graham Shepherd-Jones, Master St Crispin
Lodge 9046
Having read the "Year in the life of a secretary of an English
Lodge" by Worshipful Brother Alan Bevins I am moved to add
a somewhat disjointed update from the same Lodge. It just outlines
the true Masonic friendship and support of that band of brethren
who practice their masonry at St Crispin lodge 9046.
A new duly installed master took over the running of the Lodge
for the year 2001 - 2002. His name Gerald Crease-Smith. Each and
every member of St Crispin knew that "Gerry" has Dyslexia
and hence found learning his ritual extremely difficult. It was
therefore with some disbelief that we saw him rise through the minor
offices and find himself eligible to be elected as Master. He was
duly unanimously elected by the Brethren of St Crispin to be their
Master for the year. Maybe, you might think that this was just a
simple gesture to Gerry and that the lodge would somehow manage
to struggle through the year with the minimum amount of pain.
What happened was one of the most encouraging sights in masonry
I have yet to witness. It has instilled in me something that I shall
remember for the rest of my life. It is not the correct presentation
and faultless recital of ritual that has kept masonry together for
so long, which even Gerald would agree, was never going to happen
in his year. It was the true support and encouragement from each
and every member of the Lodge. Even this would have made his year
one to be remembered, but the true meaning of masonry, brotherhood
and friendship emanated from Gerald. He showed so much Brotherly
love as master of St Crispin to each and every brother who attended
during his year, visitors included.
Gerald had without any question been a very active mason, visiting
other lodges and enrolling in Chapter. His outgoing and friendly
nature always rubbed off on everyone he met, and it was as no surprise
that on the evening of his installation the Lodge was full to capacity.
I believe this was as much an encouragement to the brethren of the
lodge as it was to Gerry. At a time when Freemasonry has declined
in numbers it is this kind of evening that will bring members back
and entice new members to join.
I have no words to be able to describe the warmth and Brotherly
love that emanated from the Lodge that evening and during the festive
board that followed. You will have to take my word that it was one
of the most pleasurable experiences I have encountered. I'm sure
that each and everyone there felt it. This evening could have been
the pinnacle of his mastership but Gerry continued to grow in warmth
at every meeting.
What I have learned from his year is to encourage each and every
brother, support them in any way possible. If you have the talent
to produce ritual by the book then put whatever is needed to make
it meaningful, not just recite it parrot fashion. But most of all
be open and warm hearted to everyone who has supported you and be
prepared to show them how you feel. Worshipful Brother Gerald's
mastership has left the lodge a much friendlier place and a Joy
to visit.
This year as the immediate past master he has offered his support
to the reigning master and also without fail attends class of instruction
just to pass on to his best abilities his experience.
I know without a shadow of doubt that everything he did or said
during his year was from the Heart and should we ever be able to
reproduce one tenth of the warmth he generated this world would
be a far greater place and masonry will thrive because of it.
God bless you Brother Gerald, you are an inspiration to us all.
Graham Shepherd-Jones - June 2003
< Back to Miscellany
of Masonic Information

|