Letter Perfect
“We put too much emphasis on Ritual, and not
enough on the higher things in Masonry!”
How often have we heard that said; how often some of us have said
it!
A statement which has the ring of authority often passes for fact.
So accustomed are we to the voice of the boss, the law or the minister
that we get out of the habit of questioning, “Is it True?”
Yet it will be of use to us here to question closely and ascertain
if too much emphasis “IS” put upon ritual.
It is easy enough to state what Ritual is - certain words arranged
in a certain way, which have come down to us, so we say, from time
“Immemorial” and by means of which we confer degrees,
and impart Masonic teachings to novices, and incidentally, to the
brethren who attend lodge. But when we ask “Why is Ritual?”
the answer is not so easy.
We have before us constantly the example set by school, college,
tutor and student; knowledge is knowledge whether given in a set
form or otherwise. “Twice two is equal to four” is no
more true than is “four is the product of two multiplied by
two.” We can say two time two, or twice two, two by two; and
express exactly the same truth. We learn no words by rote, when
we study history. The medical student learns geography of the body,
but not the heart. Everywhere it is shown to us that real knowledge
does not depend upon a certain form of words, and that it is the
fact, not the word, which is the important thing.
Why, then. this insistence upon an exact memorization of the “Words”
of the Ritual? Why do we lay so much stress upon the successful
employment of a mighty memory? Why do we insist that those who confer
degrees should spend painful hours in long and arduous study in
order that certain sentences, often of an involved and old-fashioned
construction, may be uttered in a certain way only, and only in
a certain way for the instruction of candidates?
Yet there are several reason why Ritual is important.
Let us examine and see for ourselves that there really are explanations
of the need for memorization.
One of the great appeals of Freemasonry, both to the profane and
the initiate, is its antiquity. The Order can trace an unbroken
history of more than two hundred years in its present form (the
first Grand Lodge was formed in 1717), and has irrefutable documentary
evidence of a much longer existence in simpler forms. There is very
complete circumstantial evidence that Freemasonry is the legitimate
and only heir to guilds, societies, organizations and systems of
teaching which run so far back into the past that they are lost
in the mists which shroud antiquity.
Our present Rituals - the plural is used advisedly, as no two jurisdictions
are exactly at one with another on what is correct in Ritual - are
source books from which we prove just where we came from, and, to
some extent, just when. For instance, the penalties are so obviously
taken from some of the early English Laws, that no sensible student
can believe that they were invented or first used, let us say, in
the time of King Solomon.
If we alter our Ritual, either intentionally or by poor memorization,
we gradually lose the many references concealed in our words and
sentences, which tell the story of where we came and when. It is
a beautiful thing to do as all have done who have gone this way
before us. To say the same words, take the same obligations, repeat
the same ceremonies that Washington underwent, gives us feeling
of kinship with the Father of this country which no non-Mason may
have, But this we must lose if we change our Ritual, little by little,
altering it by poor work; forgetting or leaving words out.
Time is relative to the observer; what is very slow to the man
may be very rapid to nature. Nature has all the time there is. To
drop out a word here, put in a new one there, eliminate this sentence
and add that one to our Ritual - a very few score of years - the
old Ritual will be entirely altered and become something new.
We have a confirmation of this. Certain parts of the Ritual are
printed. The expressions in these printed paragraphs are, practically
and universally the same in most of our jurisdictions. Occasionally
there is a variation, showing where some Committee on Work and Lectures
has not been afraid to change the work of the Fathers. But, as a
whole, the printed portion of our work is substantially what it
was when it was first composed and phrased, probably by Preston
and Dermott. But the “Secret Work,” given between portions
of the printed work, is very different in many of our jurisdictions.
Some of these differences, of course, are accounted for by different
original sources, yet even in two jurisdictions which had the same
source of Freemasonry and originally had the same work, we found
variations, showing that “Mouth To Ear” no matter how
secret it may be, is not a wholly accurate way of transmitting words.
If then, in spite of us, alterations creep in by the slow process
of time and human fallibility, how much faster will the Ritual change
if we are careless, indifferent, or in open rebellion against established
Masonic tradition? The further away we get from our original source,
the more meticulously careful must trustworthy Masons be to pass
on to posterity the work exactly as we received it.
The Mason of olden time could go to his source for re-inspiration
andre-instruction - we cannot.
Ritual is the thread which binds us to those who immediately preceded
us, as their Ritual bound them to their fathers, our grandfathers.
The Ritual we hand down to our sons, and their son’s sons,
will be their bond with us, and through us, with the historic dead.
To alter that bond intentionally is to wrong those who come after
us, even as we have been wronged where those who preceded us were
care-less or inefficient in their memorization and rendition of
the Ritual.
It is not for us to say “This Form of Words is Better Because
They are Plainer,” any more than it is for us to say that
we can build a “Better” Temple than Solomon erected,
or write a “Better” document than the Constitution of
the United States.
“But we amend the Constitution!” some brother may argue.
Aye, we amend it, but we do not alter it. We keep the old, just
as it was written, and write our amendments separately, And we have
been obliged to amend the Masonic procedure of our progenitors in
many ways. Modern times require modern methods. But we can add to
our procedure without changing our Ritual. Every Masonic Book on
symbol-ism is an addition, but it is not a change. Every lecture
delivered by a student of Masonry may open up a new vision, but
it is not a change in the old. To amplify, explain, expound is but
to give that “Good and Wholesome Instruction” which
a Master is sworn to do, but all that may be done without in any
way altering the fundamentals of our methods of teaching.
But there is a great and more important reason than any of these.
Freemasonry is not a thing, but a system of thought. It is not something
that may be bought or sold - it can only be won. We may not wrap
up Freemasonry in a package and give to an initiate. All we can
do is to lead him to the gate, beyond which lies the field which
he may till, the mine in which he may dig, the treasure house from
which he may help himself.
Our duty is to lead him so that the way is clear - to give him
instructions in such a way that he cannot miss the path. This we
do by our ceremonies, our Ritual. In our Ritual is contained the
germ of all those philosophical and moral truths which Freemasonry
teaches. In our Ritual is at least one explanation of our symbols.
In the Ritual are the real secrets of Freemasonry made plain for
those who have ears to hear.
If we memorize our Ritual badly, we put the emphasis on the way
we say it, not on what we say. If we omit or interpolate, we change
the instructions which generations of Masons have found to be effective.
If we do not pass on to others what we have received, just as we
have received it we handicap those who profess to teach, and thus
can have no right to complain if they do not become good Masons,
but merely lodge members.
A candidate comes among us, knowing nothing of the Fraternity beyond
the fact that it is an association of men in an Order which has
had the approbation of leaders of men for hundreds of years. Upon
the impression we make upon him when he takes his degrees will depend
not only the kind of Mason he becomes, but in some respects, the
judgment the world will make of Masonry, since it can only judge
of the institution from the individual.
The impression make upon him will depend very largely on the character
of the work we do - the care and attention we have given to its
preparation - the ease with which the dear old words come from our
hearts and lips.
Any one, with time and attention, can memorize Ritual. But it is
not enough merely to know it and deliver it so it sounds, as something
learned by rote, parrot like, unimpressive. We may not speak as
an orator speaks; we may not have his personality and the impressiveness
of the actor, but we all can, if we only will, attain the perfec-tion
of letter-knowledge; we can learn our Ritual so that it becomes
a part of us, and give it forth with ease and clarity, if not with
fire and force. The vast majority of Ritualists are but indifferent
elocutionists; Freemasonry neither expects nor extracts a very high
standard of delivery from us, her servants. But to make up for that
which nature has denied us, we owe to Freemasonry that willingness
to study, that care in preparation, that interest in perfection
which alone will enable us to pass on to these who are to be our
Brothers, her teachings, her instructions, the Holy fire concealed
in her old, old words.
Be not discourage then, if Ritual “Comes Hard.” Fail
not in the task, nor question that it is worth while, for on what
we do, and on the way in which we do it depends in a large measure
the Freemasonry of the future. As we do well or ill, so will those
who come after us do ill or well.
< Back to Miscellany
of Masonic Information

|